The Shroud of Turin has long been regarded by many Christians as a sacred relic and is one of the most extensively examined artifacts in history. Believers hold that the linen cloth once wrapped the body of Jesus Christ after his crucifixion, while scientists and historians have spent decades debating whether it is genuine.
The cloth, housed in the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in Turin, Italy, bears a faint image that many identify as Christ. While its origin remains disputed, new claims have reignited discussion about its authenticity.

Biblical scholar Dr. Jeremiah Johnston now says scientific testing has confirmed that some of the blood found on the Shroud is human. According to Johnston, analyses conducted in the 1990s identified blood type AB on the cloth—a rare blood group found in roughly six percent of the population. He stated that the blood has been verified as human and male, eliminating the possibility of animal blood or a fabricated hoax.
Johnston also explained that the blood traces show characteristics of both pre-mortem and post-mortem bleeding, a detail he describes as highly unusual. “To recreate something like this, a person would actually have to die,” he claimed, emphasizing that the combination of blood patterns does not align with typical decomposition. For some believers, this anomaly supports the idea of resurrection.

Interest in the Shroud has also surged following the use of artificial intelligence to generate a possible facial image based on the cloth’s imprint, offering a modern interpretation of what Jesus may have looked like.
Despite these claims, the Shroud of Turin remains controversial. Carbon dating tests conducted in the past suggested the cloth originated between 1260 and 1390, which would place it well after the time of Jesus. However, later researchers questioned those results, arguing that the tested samples may have come from a repaired section rather than the original fabric. As a result, debate over the Shroud’s true origins continues.